Connect with us


2 days soon after release of Arnab Goswami, Republic Tv CEO interogated in 2018 suicide scenario




2 days after release of Arnab Goswami, Republic TV CEO interogated in 2018 suicide case

Continuing their witch-hunt towards Republic Media Network, the Raigad Police on Friday questioned Republic TV’s Chief Economic Officer (CFO) S Sundaram in link to the 2018 suicide scenario of interior decorator Anvay Naik, only two days soon after editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami was unveiled from Taloja jail.

According to the reports, the Raigad Law enforcement experienced previously summoned S Sundaram for questioning him in the 2018 suicide case. The summons to Republic Tv CFO arrives two days just after Republic Television editor-in-main Arnab Goswami was granted interim bail in the exact same situation by the Supreme Court docket.

Reportedly, Raigad law enforcement experienced summoned Sundaram just after Arnab Goswami had allegedly claimed that making payments on behalf of the business was the task of the CFO. Accordingly, the law enforcement officers have issued summons to him and asked him to show up in advance of them on Friday.

The officer stated they will scrutinise the monetary records of the accused. “A number of additional persons will be issued summons in the coming days,” the officer said, introducing that they will also audit additional economic data right before submitting a cost-sheet in the matter.

Supreme Court docket grants bail to Arnab Goswami

On Wednesday, a Supreme Court bench comprising of Justice Chandrachud and Justice Indu Malhotra listening to the petition reported that Bombay Higher Court docket created an error in rejecting the application for grant of interim bail on technical grounds. Granting the bail to Arnab Goswami, the apex courtroom also directed the Raigad law enforcement to ensure the compliance of the buy of release of Arnab Goswami forthwith.

The Supreme Court docket also asked Arnab Goswami and two other accused to execute a own bond for an quantity of Rs 50,000 for launch on interim bail.

Justice Chandrachud, listening to the plea experienced built scathing observations stating, “If we really do not interfere in this circumstance today we will stroll on route of destruction. If left to me I will not watch the channel and you could differ in ideology but Constitutional courts will have to defend these freedoms”.

Arnab was arrested last 7 days by the Mumbai Law enforcement after it experienced reopened 2018 abatement of the suicide circumstance of an architect, Anvay Naik. On the 4th of November, 15-20 policemen armed with assault weapons and led by face cop Sachin Vaze experienced stormed into the dwelling of Arnab Goswami and dragged him out. The 2018 circumstance has been unilaterally opened in opposition to right after it was shut in 2019 at the behest of the Dwelling Minister of Maharashtra, Anil Deshmukh.


Farmer protest: Listed here is why city India requirements to reject the blackmail by Yogendra Yadav




Farmer protest: Here is why urban India needs to reject the blackmail by Yogendra Yadav

This is primetime information from yesterday, hosted by Rajdeep Sardesai. On one facet of the discussion is a consultant of the BJP. On the other aspect of the discussion on farmer protests, is Yogendra Yadav, the president of Swaraj India. The banner reads “Gold conventional of journalism” as they explore the ‘farmer protest’ in Punjab.

The Prime Time discussion on India These days, hosted by Rajdeep Sardesai on the farmer protest

At a person point, Mr. Yogendra Yadav stated, “I, on behalf of all the farmers of this country…

And that, in a nutshell, is all you have to have to know about the media circus close to so identified as “farmers protests” yesterday. By the way, I am also pointing a finger at the BJP for validating this, by humoring the president of Swaraj India, whatever that is.

Now you may inquire: what if a consultant of the world’s major party is willing to debate what appears to be the world’s smallest occasion? Really should we not respect each and every voice, large or modest? But then, the issue is, why only Yogendra Yadav? Why the same Yogendra Yadav on each difficulty from Bihar election to Delhi riots to agriculture in Punjab? This is not a display of regard for each individual voice. This is about one particular individual being showered with the privilege of being heard on just about every forum and on every single situation. All mainly because he has good friends in the media.

Yogendra Yadav as the experience of “farmers” protest is not a display of our democratic values. It is a clearly show of privilege. It is an insult to the democratic spirit.

If you want to have an understanding of how produced up the so-named “farmers” protest is, take into consideration the quantities. In India, about 50% of the population is dependent on agriculture. That is 60 crore men and women. In accordance to “activists,” these 60 crore people today are in threat of losing their livelihood because of to the new farm rules. And in the 3 months considering that these 60 crore persons have been supposedly protesting, they have managed fifty percent a day of “Bharat Bandh” in some pieces of Punjab and managed to fill one very small bridge on Punjab-Haryana border yesterday.

Farmer protest in Punjab (scpeengrab from NDTV protection)

Apparently, a few dozen jawans of Haryana Law enforcement have managed to maintain off an agitation that comprises 60 crore people today. If 60 crore persons in this nation have been offended, which police drive could halt them? Which street or bridge would they block? Would the nation keep on observe for even just one next, enable alone three months?

But, in accordance to media, “farmers” are protesting. You just didn’t detect 60 crore persons protesting mainly because Haryana Law enforcement has been stopping them by placing barricades on 1 bridge somewhere.

This just can’t be. No one can hide protests that large.

So let us change the tables versus this media circus. For just one, allow us cease calling them “farmer protest.” Listed here is the famed farmer’s march from 2018 that took social media by storm, pictured right here in The Hindu.

Farmers march of 2018

Come on in this article. We have eyes. That’s not a “farmers march.” That’s a bunch of men and women strolling with CPIM flags. If they ended up marching with BJP flags, we would contact it a BJP protest. But for some weird motive, when they march with a Communist banner like that of All India Kisan Sabha, we contact it a “farmers march.” When the CPIM women’s wing protests, it is named a “women’s protest.” When the still left wing AISA is on the streets, the media calls it “student protests.” If ABVP does the same, it is having said that identified as an “ABVP protest.”

How very long are we going to let the media get absent with this privilege reserved only for Communists and properly related considerably remaining elites like Yogendra Yadav? When will we quit pretending that they depict normal teams of persons (farmers, students or women of all ages), rather of just a handful of their comrades? And in the situation of Yogendra Yadav, just himself.

Place you in the shoes of a farmer and think evidently. Would you really choose Yogendra Yadav as your leader?

The media focus on a couple of hundred protesters on a very small bridge and Yogendra Yadav as the facial area of the intended agitation demonstrates that this is a mere circus. They are not elevating any actual problems, this is just to get your blood strain and their TRPs up. By taking the full issue critically, you are not executing farmers a favor. You are in fact insulting them.

In India, someone or the other is always indignant. A couple of hundred protesters are always blocking a bridge someplace. Yes, they have a proper to be read and they will be. Whichever settlement they achieve with the governing administration will in transform make yet another team of 500 individuals angry. And they will go block an additional bridge someplace.

Continue Reading